CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/insertion/k-insertion/
normalized-3-insertions-4-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/insertion/k-insertion/
normalized-3-insertions-4-3.xml
MD5SUM099adc731e61bf51862e5dd47060b6c3
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.16167
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables281
Number of constraints1046
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size3
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension1046
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
galac M1090837UNSAT 1.83772 2.00311
galac E1090838UNSAT 1.88471 1.92909
Sugar v1.13+picosat1090832UNSAT 2.16167 2.27155
Sugar v1.13+minisat1090833UNSAT 2.22566 2.3197
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131090831UNSAT 5.31619 5.36372
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105672UNSAT 16.9204 17.1252
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271090830UNSAT 24.3993 24.5001
Mistral-prime 1.3131090840UNSAT 37.2463 37.5715
MDG-probe 2008-06-271090829UNSAT 38.3922 38.587
cpHydra k_101090845UNSAT 47.6448 53.2229
casper zito1090842UNSAT 70.7782 71.0612
cpHydra k_401090846UNSAT 72.7399 73.0486
Abscon 112v4 AC1090843UNSAT 87.8276 87.8856
casper zao1090841UNSAT 97.1672 98.0132
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1090844UNSAT 97.1862 97.2797
Mistral-option 1.3141090839UNSAT 110.263 111.132
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261090836UNSAT 397.974 398.205
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261090835UNSAT 410.596 411.791
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301090828UNSAT 826.3 833.376
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301090826? (TO) 1800.01 1802.22
bpsolver 2008-06-271090834? (TO) 1800.02 1812.61
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301090827? (TO) 1800.04 1810.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: