CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/insertion/full-insertion/
normalized-5-fullins-4-8.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/insertion/full-insertion/
normalized-5-fullins-4-8.xml
MD5SUMd8426990ab3905f5f7996c01eb8bf26d
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.78812
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables1085
Number of constraints11395
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension11395
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261090563UNSAT 5.78812 5.84639
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261090562UNSAT 6.77697 6.89943
Sugar v1.13+picosat1090559UNSAT 101.963 103.031
Sugar v1.13+minisat1090560UNSAT 119.27 119.981
MDG-probe 2008-06-271090556UNSAT 224.536 226.276
Mistral-prime 1.3131090567UNSAT 293.091 295.597
cpHydra k_101090572UNSAT 293.366 294.917
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271090557UNSAT 498.749 502.54
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105665UNSAT 792.3 792.72
Mistral-option 1.3141090566UNSAT 836.233 838.098
cpHydra k_401090573UNSAT 1040.29 1057.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301090553? (TO) 1800.01 1808.72
galac E1090565? (TO) 1800.03 1815.61
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301090554? (TO) 1800.05 1804.62
casper zito1090569? (TO) 1800.05 1811.71
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301090555? (TO) 1800.07 1806.82
bpsolver 2008-06-271090561? (TO) 1800.07 1809.21
galac M1090564? (TO) 1800.08 1814.92
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131090558? (TO) 1800.09 1807.09
casper zao1090568? (TO) 1800.1 1804.12
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1090571? (TO) 1800.13 1803.68
Abscon 112v4 AC1090570? (TO) 1800.13 1804.74

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: