CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-25/
normalized-lei450-25d-05.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-25/
normalized-lei450-25d-05.xml
MD5SUM179699748a827b786a394bf046db08b2
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.683895
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables450
Number of constraints17425
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension17425
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cpHydra k_101089438UNSAT 0.683895 0.689066
Mistral-prime 1.3131089433UNSAT 0.694893 0.706416
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089422UNSAT 0.702893 0.716683
Mistral-option 1.3141089432UNSAT 0.705892 0.717411
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089423UNSAT 0.707891 0.718358
cpHydra k_401089439UNSAT 0.71589 0.728968
bpsolver 2008-06-271089427UNSAT 2.32865 2.35595
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105700UNSAT 3.2765 3.33091
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089426UNSAT 4.24035 4.38802
Abscon 112v4 AC1089436UNSAT 4.39733 4.42853
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089437UNSAT 4.47732 4.5701
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089425UNSAT 5.8841 5.99605
galac M1089430UNSAT 6.42202 6.52115
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089429UNSAT 7.09892 7.2155
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089424UNSAT 7.2439 7.28972
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089428UNSAT 7.73182 7.83334
galac E1089431UNSAT 8.13676 8.27612
casper zao1089434UNSAT 32.5251 32.8369
casper zito1089435UNSAT 44.6022 44.9842
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089421UNSAT 126.812 128.068
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089419? (TO) 1800.04 1800.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089420? (TO) 1800.08 1808.43

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: