CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford2/
normalized-langford-2-5.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford2/
normalized-langford-2-5.xml
MD5SUM42a251b4e5e78e8baab98daca83f50dd
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.005998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables10
Number of constraints50
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension50
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271084693UNSAT 0.005998 0.014589
MDG-probe 2008-06-271084692UNSAT 0.006998 0.014876
Mistral-prime 1.3131084703UNSAT 0.007998 0.0148109
casper zito1084705UNSAT 0.008997 0.0167009
Mistral-option 1.3141084702UNSAT 0.008998 0.0137499
casper zao1084704UNSAT 0.015997 0.0194439
cpHydra k_401084709UNSAT 0.019996 0.026624
cpHydra k_101084708UNSAT 0.019996 0.0263989
bpsolver 2008-06-271084697UNSAT 0.029994 0.0303889
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105901UNSAT 0.333948 0.384178
Sugar v1.13+picosat1084695UNSAT 0.532918 0.627899
Sugar v1.13+minisat1084696UNSAT 0.591909 0.63581
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261084699UNSAT 0.616905 0.627802
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261084698UNSAT 0.641901 0.684022
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301084691UNSAT 0.674897 0.703486
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1084707UNSAT 0.71589 0.735805
Abscon 112v4 AC1084706UNSAT 0.731888 0.790784
galac E1084701UNSAT 0.883864 0.901597
galac M1084700UNSAT 0.896863 0.948043
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131084694UNSAT 1.43678 1.57358
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301084690? (TO) 1800.08 1804.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301084689? (TO) 1800.09 1813.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: