CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford2/
normalized-langford-2-17.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford2/
normalized-langford-2-17.xml
MD5SUMf3b6b4c03660c6eba283dd0327fa94ab
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables34
Number of constraints578
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size34
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension578
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
galac M1084658? (TO) 1800.01 1810.21
cpHydra k_101084666? (TO) 1800.01 1812.03
cpHydra k_401084667? (TO) 1800.01 1814.83
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301084649? (TO) 1800.02 1803.42
MDG-probe 2008-06-271084650? (TO) 1800.02 1813.71
Mistral-option 1.3141084660? (TO) 1800.04 1804.21
casper zao1084662? (TO) 1800.04 1807.31
bpsolver 2008-06-271084655? (TO) 1800.05 1811.21
galac E1084659? (TO) 1800.05 1815.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301084648? (TO) 1800.05 1817.22
Sugar v1.13+picosat1084653? (TO) 1800.07 1801.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301084647? (TO) 1800.08 1800.42
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105893? (TO) 1800.08 1803.11
Mistral-prime 1.3131084661? (TO) 1800.09 1813.71
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261084656? (TO) 1800.09 1808.38
casper zito1084663? (TO) 1800.1 1810.11
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271084651? (TO) 1800.11 1810.61
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1084665? (TO) 1800.11 1803.85
Abscon 112v4 AC1084664? (TO) 1800.11 1803.47
Sugar v1.13+minisat1084654? (TO) 1800.11 1809.43
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131084652? (TO) 1800.14 1809.61
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261084657? (TO) 1800.18 1807.68

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: