CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rlfapScensMod/
normalized-scen3-f11.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rlfapScensMod/
normalized-scen3-f11.xml
MD5SUMab367ba35f9b0dcd1e9d2e604b57c018
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.58391
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables400
Number of constraints2760
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size33
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension2760
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cpHydra k_101083616UNSAT 0.58391 0.591197
cpHydra k_401083617UNSAT 0.591909 0.59837
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271083601UNSAT 0.596909 0.603962
Mistral-prime 1.3131083611UNSAT 0.645901 0.65221
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1083615UNSAT 3.51946 3.57155
Abscon 112v4 AC1083614UNSAT 3.62445 3.77043
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301083599UNSAT 4.34434 4.45759
Mistral-option 1.3141083610UNSAT 4.51531 4.54075
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261083606UNSAT 4.91325 4.95894
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261083607UNSAT 5.30519 5.38043
MDG-probe 2008-06-271083600UNSAT 5.52316 5.57601
Sugar v1.13+minisat1083604UNSAT 5.77012 5.94582
Sugar v1.13+picosat1083603UNSAT 7.00094 7.23476
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131083602UNSAT 10.8154 10.9472
casper zao1083612UNSAT 12.6881 12.8042
galac M1083608UNSAT 16.2195 16.39
galac E1083609UNSAT 18.5702 18.9578
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301083598? (TO) 1800.02 1813.02
casper zito1083613? (TO) 1800.04 1815.61
bpsolver 2008-06-271083605? (TO) 1800.05 1807.01
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107007? (TO) 1800.06 1815.31
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301083597? (TO) 1800.1 1809.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: