CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/super-os/super-os-taillard-7/
normalized-super-os-taillard-7-30.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/super-os/super-os-taillard-7/
normalized-super-os-taillard-7-30.xml
MD5SUMffaa9cc3319fa6165d508354e57e0a1d
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.611906
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables98
Number of constraints931
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size378
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension931
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131082690UNSAT 0.611906 0.620225
cpHydra k_401082696UNSAT 1.06184 1.0718
cpHydra k_101082695UNSAT 1.06884 1.08
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261082686UNSAT 1.48377 1.52958
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261082685UNSAT 1.50477 1.57407
MDG-probe 2008-06-271082679UNSAT 2.16467 2.17604
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271082680UNSAT 3.12852 3.14391
Sugar v1.13+minisat1082683UNSAT 3.54546 3.71167
Sugar v1.13+picosat1082682UNSAT 8.33473 8.52862
Mistral-option 1.3141082689UNSAT 191.779 192.553
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107120UNSAT 278.265 280.687
bpsolver 2008-06-271082684UNSAT 1339.18 1350.51
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301082678UNSAT 1697.57 1705.86
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131082681? 225.593 226
galac M1082687? (MO) 813 815.714
galac E1082688? (MO) 818.31 827.014
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301082676? (TO) 1800.02 1811.32
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301082677? (TO) 1800.06 1803.72
casper zito1082692? (TO) 1800.06 1806.31
casper zao1082691? (TO) 1800.1 1808.21
Abscon 112v4 AC1082693? (TO) 1800.11 1804.63
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1082694? (TO) 1800.15 1800.88

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: