CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-44.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-44.xml
MD5SUM7dd4f2d9b7be1977ee746548775a9ebb
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.033994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables144
Number of constraints64
Maximum constraint arity15
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension64
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131080628UNSAT 0.033994 0.034995
Mistral-option 1.3141080627UNSAT 0.033994 0.0351609
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080617UNSAT 0.035994 0.042571
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080618UNSAT 0.036993 0.0414049
cpHydra k_101080633UNSAT 0.046992 0.0519101
cpHydra k_401080634UNSAT 0.048992 0.0542989
casper zito1080630UNSAT 0.073988 0.0867261
bpsolver 2008-06-271080622UNSAT 0.082987 0.090296
casper zao1080629UNSAT 0.686895 0.713165
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080623UNSAT 0.944855 0.990492
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080624UNSAT 0.967852 0.995894
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080621UNSAT 1.41478 1.54648
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080620UNSAT 1.46878 1.55614
Abscon 112v4 AC1080631UNSAT 2.76058 2.82494
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080632UNSAT 2.87056 2.92262
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080615UNSAT 154.796 156.322
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080616UNSAT 154.94 156.479
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080614UNSAT 167.211 168.784
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106606? 0.368942 0.38462
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080619? 252.13 250.833
galac E1080626? (problem) 125.737 126.968
galac M1080625? (problem) 130.83 131.292

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: