CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-24-24-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-24-24-76-632-fcd-10_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-24-24-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-24-24-76-632-fcd-10_ext.xml
MD5SUM1a3479aef1bab58ff39ed2c94bbcc237
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1175.69
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables24
Number of constraints76
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size24
Number of constraints which are defined in extension76
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271072265SAT 1060.79 1061.08
Mistral-option 1.3141072275SAT 1175.69 1185.44
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271072266SAT 1200.24 1209.05
Mistral-prime 1.3131072276SAT 1216.69 1225.95
mddc-solv 2008-06-091072263SAT 1258.89 1264.7
cpHydra k_101072281SAT 1392.03 1402.04
cpHydra k_401072282SAT 1437.01 1441.56
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301072262SAT 1663 1669.4
casper zito1072278? (TO) 1800.01 1806.11
Sugar v1.13+minisat1072269? (TO) 1800.02 1808.83
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301072260? (TO) 1800.02 1812.93
galac M1072273? (TO) 1800.02 1803.71
casper zao1072277? (TO) 1800.03 1807.32
galac E1072274? (TO) 1800.04 1806.71
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301072261? (TO) 1800.04 1813.72
bpsolver 2008-06-271072270? (TO) 1800.06 1809.23
Sugar v1.13+picosat1072268? (TO) 1800.07 1810.43
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261072271? (TO) 1800.07 1815.27
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106848? (TO) 1800.08 1807.11
Abscon 112v4 AC1072279? (TO) 1800.08 1813.14
spider 2008-06-141072264? (TO) 1800.08 1800.91
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261072272? (TO) 1800.11 1811.56
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131072267? (TO) 1800.17 1804.3
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1072280? (TO) 1800.18 1806.29

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
9 12 21 6 22 19 13 16 21 22 19 11 15 0 15 0 22 1 13 22 5 1 3 20