CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/aim-50/
normalized-aim-50-2-0-sat-1_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/aim-50/
normalized-aim-50-2-0-sat-1_ext.xml
MD5SUM000aa20ebf6fadca94eb5821ad5a7d8d
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.007998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints94
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension94
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141053326SAT 0.007998 0.0152091
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271053317SAT 0.008998 0.0151299
Mistral-prime 1.3131053327SAT 0.009997 0.0158259
casper zao1053328SAT 0.011997 0.0190579
casper zito1053329SAT 0.013997 0.021732
spider 2008-06-141053315SAT 0.016996 0.0221019
cpHydra k_101053332SAT 0.020996 0.0276569
cpHydra k_401053333SAT 0.020996 0.0277151
MDG-probe 2008-06-271053316SAT 0.022995 0.030802
mddc-solv 2008-06-091053314SAT 0.040992 0.047679
bpsolver 2008-06-271053321SAT 0.207967 0.209013
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105110SAT 0.331949 0.395406
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301053312SAT 0.38594 0.42672
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261053323SAT 0.392939 0.414692
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301053313SAT 0.393939 0.424659
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261053322SAT 0.454929 0.473403
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301053311SAT 0.52292 0.574142
Sugar v1.13+picosat1053319SAT 0.603907 0.703339
Sugar v1.13+minisat1053320SAT 0.608907 0.704517
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131053318SAT 0.758884 0.764383
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1053331SAT 0.788879 0.848731
galac E1053325SAT 0.819874 0.881474
galac M1053324SAT 0.854869 0.883805
Abscon 112v4 AC1053330SAT 0.871867 0.890333

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0