CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/aim-50/
normalized-aim-50-2-0-sat-3_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/aim-50/
normalized-aim-50-2-0-sat-3_ext.xml
MD5SUM4e08b59db74331f3fc708d750c6151ad
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.008998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints96
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension96
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271053271SAT 0.008998 0.015024
Mistral-option 1.3141053280SAT 0.008998 0.015308
Mistral-prime 1.3131053281SAT 0.009998 0.015121
MDG-probe 2008-06-271053270SAT 0.011997 0.017539
casper zao1053282SAT 0.012997 0.022373
casper zito1053283SAT 0.014997 0.0217881
spider 2008-06-141053269SAT 0.019996 0.0256179
cpHydra k_401053287SAT 0.019996 0.0269559
cpHydra k_101053286SAT 0.020996 0.0272599
mddc-solv 2008-06-091053268SAT 0.051991 0.0571669
bpsolver 2008-06-271053275SAT 0.070989 0.0771049
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105108SAT 0.32295 0.335947
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301053267SAT 0.355945 0.366225
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301053266SAT 0.419935 0.477401
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261053277SAT 0.442931 0.467683
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261053276SAT 0.472927 0.528124
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301053265SAT 0.553915 0.592496
Sugar v1.13+minisat1053274SAT 0.598908 0.65877
Sugar v1.13+picosat1053273SAT 0.609906 0.697611
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131053272SAT 0.747885 0.763835
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1053285SAT 0.762883 0.789301
galac M1053278SAT 0.842871 0.875733
galac E1053279SAT 0.85387 0.965097
Abscon 112v4 AC1053284SAT 0.871867 0.904309

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0