CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/aim-50/
normalized-aim-50-3-4-sat-2_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/aim-50/
normalized-aim-50-3-4-sat-2_ext.xml
MD5SUMdb6913143b44bf8d8aa7dc729e0c2597
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.009997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints161
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension161
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131053143SAT 0.009997 0.0167659
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271053133SAT 0.010997 0.016702
Mistral-option 1.3141053142SAT 0.010997 0.0159389
MDG-probe 2008-06-271053132SAT 0.014996 0.021892
casper zao1053144SAT 0.018996 0.0264391
casper zito1053145SAT 0.020996 0.021314
cpHydra k_401053149SAT 0.021996 0.0337991
cpHydra k_101053148SAT 0.021996 0.0283989
spider 2008-06-141053131SAT 0.029994 0.036073
bpsolver 2008-06-271053137SAT 0.052991 0.0605859
mddc-solv 2008-06-091053130SAT 0.05499 0.062826
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301053129SAT 0.372942 0.434932
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105102SAT 0.409936 0.416515
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301053127SAT 0.436933 0.496053
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301053128SAT 0.441932 0.493077
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261053138SAT 0.460929 0.526158
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261053139SAT 0.512921 0.527548
Sugar v1.13+picosat1053135SAT 0.6509 0.744673
Sugar v1.13+minisat1053136SAT 0.661898 0.746676
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1053147SAT 0.827873 0.834789
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131053134SAT 0.870866 0.932106
galac E1053141SAT 0.905862 0.989759
Abscon 112v4 AC1053146SAT 0.918859 0.949631
galac M1053140SAT 1.16682 1.24699

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1