CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg5-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg5-6_ext.xml
MD5SUMf5ddb3e6c7682f9213f2157a606798c1
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.132978
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints11
Maximum constraint arity6
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension11
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271069097SAT 0.132978 0.138666
mddc-solv 2008-06-091069094SAT 0.155975 0.158857
Mistral-prime 1.3131069107SAT 0.514921 0.523541
cpHydra k_401069113SAT 0.541916 0.890978
cpHydra k_101069112SAT 0.571912 0.580885
Abscon 112v4 AC1069110SAT 0.944855 1.01287
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1069111SAT 1.01584 1.04306
MDG-probe 2008-06-271069096SAT 1.2878 1.29472
Mistral-option 1.3141069106SAT 1.41878 1.42866
casper zito1069109SAT 2.25466 2.26883
casper zao1069108SAT 2.30665 2.32664
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261069102SAT 2.85756 2.91549
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107337SAT 3.04854 3.12231
spider 2008-06-141069095SAT 3.08353 3.13344
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261069103SAT 3.72443 3.81731
bpsolver 2008-06-271069101SAT 5.69713 5.69971
Sugar v1.13+minisat1069100SAT 99.7998 99.9944
Sugar v1.13+picosat1069099SAT 138.289 139.624
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301069093SAT 154.892 157.163
galac M1069104SAT 267.772 270.219
galac E1069105SAT 420.064 436.649
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131069098? (exit code) 146.12 145.981
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301069092? (TO) 1800.04 1802.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301069091? (TO) 1800.1 1807.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
10 0 18 7 0 18 0 18 2 4 13 19 10 22 0 13 25 0 0 8 17 6 0 15 18 12 4 4 2 7