CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/golombRulerArity3/
normalized-ruler-70-13-a3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/golombRulerArity3/
normalized-ruler-70-13-a3.xml
MD5SUM944163575f12720c687c0df864291e95
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.108983
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables91
Number of constraints3159
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size71
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3159
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271050812UNSAT 0.108983 0.116568
Mistral-option 1.3141050821UNSAT 0.110982 0.11794
MDG-probe 2008-06-271050811UNSAT 0.110982 0.118262
Mistral-prime 1.3131050822UNSAT 0.113982 0.118935
cpHydra k_101050827UNSAT 0.114981 0.118118
cpHydra k_401050828UNSAT 0.12598 0.131141
bpsolver 2008-06-271050816UNSAT 0.408937 0.422008
Abscon 112v4 AC1050825UNSAT 1.55676 1.63057
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1050826UNSAT 1.60576 1.62283
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261050817UNSAT 2.21366 2.25224
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261050818UNSAT 2.44063 2.51566
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104788UNSAT 702.199 707.618
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301050810UNSAT 1730.48 1738.94
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131050813? 121.619 120.199
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301050808? (TO) 1800.02 1801.32
Sugar v1.13+minisat1050815? (TO) 1800.03 1815.63
casper zito1050824? (TO) 1800.03 1814.91
galac E1050820? (TO) 1800.05 1803.71
casper zao1050823? (TO) 1800.05 1800.71
galac M1050819? (TO) 1800.07 1801.61
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301050809? (TO) 1800.1 1801.62
Sugar v1.13+picosat1050814? (TO) 1800.12 1813.43

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: