CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/golombRulerArity3/
normalized-ruler-17-7-a3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/golombRulerArity3/
normalized-ruler-17-7-a3.xml
MD5SUMe6f0f165c8e6890f3b1965c229a33568
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.012997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables28
Number of constraints252
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size18
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension252
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271050791UNSAT 0.012997 0.0197961
Mistral-prime 1.3131050801UNSAT 0.012997 0.0207331
Mistral-option 1.3141050800UNSAT 0.012997 0.0204399
MDG-probe 2008-06-271050790UNSAT 0.013997 0.0205869
cpHydra k_401050807UNSAT 0.024995 0.0320799
cpHydra k_101050806UNSAT 0.026995 0.308345
casper zito1050803UNSAT 0.039993 0.047564
bpsolver 2008-06-271050795UNSAT 0.05599 0.0635311
casper zao1050802UNSAT 0.218966 0.231614
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104787UNSAT 0.506922 0.549249
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1050805UNSAT 0.84487 0.885543
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261050797UNSAT 0.85087 0.886835
Abscon 112v4 AC1050804UNSAT 0.870866 0.8925
Sugar v1.13+minisat1050794UNSAT 0.905862 0.989915
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261050796UNSAT 0.938856 1.00741
Sugar v1.13+picosat1050793UNSAT 0.986849 1.08229
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301050789UNSAT 1.01284 1.06998
galac M1050798UNSAT 2.04469 2.08157
galac E1050799UNSAT 2.16467 2.20276
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301050787? (TO) 1800.06 1802.42
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301050788? (TO) 1800.08 1812.12
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131050792? (TO) 1800.14 1808.4

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: