CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-15/
normalized-os-taillard-15-95-2.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-15/
normalized-os-taillard-15-95-2.xml
MD5SUM8376fcfcac18b60a71faf845a033c81e
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.5906
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables225
Number of constraints3150
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size854
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3150
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261060056UNSAT 2.5906 2.67393
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261060055UNSAT 2.6176 2.67504
cpHydra k_401060066UNSAT 9.43257 9.67062
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131060051? 289.97 291.671
galac E1060058? (problem) 68.6586 69.4207
galac M1060057? (problem) 68.8245 69.5023
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271060050? (TO) 1800.02 1805.81
Mistral-prime 1.3131060060? (TO) 1800.02 1808.21
bpsolver 2008-06-271060054? (TO) 1800.02 1816.51
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301060046? (TO) 1800.03 1808.52
MDG-probe 2008-06-271060049? (TO) 1800.03 1811.11
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106156? (TO) 1800.04 1801.51
casper zito1060062? (TO) 1800.04 1812.51
cpHydra k_101060065? (TO) 1800.04 1808.93
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301060048? (TO) 1800.04 1896.22
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1060064? (TO) 1800.05 1817.64
Sugar v1.13+picosat1060052? (TO) 1800.05 1808.34
Sugar v1.13+minisat1060053? (TO) 1800.06 1807.41
Mistral-option 1.3141060059? (TO) 1800.07 1808.61
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301060047? (TO) 1800.08 1806.82
casper zao1060061? (TO) 1800.11 1803.52
Abscon 112v4 AC1060063? (TO) 1800.17 1810.47

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: