CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/schurrLemma/
normalized-lemma-100-9-mod.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/schurrLemma/
normalized-lemma-100-9-mod.xml
MD5SUM3386f4f322a7a484b46b823c691cf5d8
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.527919
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints2450
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size9
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension2450
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131048057UNSAT 0.527919 0.542258
Mistral-option 1.3141048056UNSAT 0.529918 0.554358
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271048047UNSAT 0.534917 0.541002
MDG-probe 2008-06-271048046UNSAT 0.538917 0.588719
cpHydra k_101048062UNSAT 0.551915 0.564611
cpHydra k_401048063UNSAT 0.553915 0.558534
bpsolver 2008-06-271048051UNSAT 0.625904 0.631572
Sugar v1.13+minisat1048050UNSAT 6.27104 6.46322
Sugar v1.13+picosat1048049UNSAT 19.517 19.8349
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104811UNSAT 29.9384 30.2644
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131048048UNSAT 351.423 353.31
galac M1048054UNSAT 751.587 758.786
galac E1048055UNSAT 1466.44 1477.02
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261048053? (problem) 1.3458 1.36755
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261048052? (problem) 1.44178 1.4742
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301048043? (TO) 1800 1800.82
casper zito1048059? (TO) 1800.02 1809.71
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301048044? (TO) 1800.02 1800.92
casper zao1048058? (TO) 1800.05 1805.81
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301048045? (TO) 1800.05 1816.22
Abscon 112v4 AC1048060? (TO) 1800.1 1813.65
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1048061? (TO) 1800.11 1800.85

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: