CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/bddLarge/
normalized-bdd-21-2713-15-79-8_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/bddLarge/
normalized-bdd-21-2713-15-79-8_ext.xml
MD5SUM3b149b59fcb401e6a1362991696864ca
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.47877
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables21
Number of constraints2713
Maximum constraint arity15
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension2713
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
spider 2008-06-141047300SAT 0.375942 0.382017
Mistral-option 1.3141047311SAT 1.47877 1.49547
MDG-probe 2008-06-271047301SAT 1.74673 1.75996
Mistral-prime 1.3131047312SAT 1.78273 1.79826
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271047302SAT 1.78573 1.79828
cpHydra k_401047318SAT 1.79273 1.81321
cpHydra k_101047317SAT 1.80872 2.04597
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1047316SAT 7.72183 7.78444
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261047307SAT 12.866 13.0276
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261047308SAT 12.961 13.0184
mddc-solv 2008-06-091047299SAT 15.8926 15.9029
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301047298SAT 31.8142 31.9982
Abscon 112v4 AC1047315SAT 39.424 39.6895
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301047296SAT 42.2896 42.791
casper zito1047314SAT 454.389 458.173
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301047297SAT 619.153 619.702
casper zao1047313SAT 646.048 651.7
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131047303? 100.806 99.7494
Sugar v1.13+minisat1047305? 134.363 134.695
Sugar v1.13+picosat1047304? 142.448 143.252
bpsolver 2008-06-271047306? (problem) 528.732 530.897
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104926? (MO) 7.4 7.51957
galac E1047310? (MO) 1769.14 1783.41
galac M1047309? (MO) 1794.91 1816.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0