CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-48.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-48.xml
MD5SUM2d1fd1339e87b59f45e67a6927c771ee
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.05999
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity24
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141057554UNSAT 0.05999 0.076717
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271057545UNSAT 0.064989 0.104443
MDG-probe 2008-06-271057544UNSAT 0.064989 0.0674471
Mistral-prime 1.3131057555UNSAT 0.066989 0.0717831
cpHydra k_101057560UNSAT 0.076987 0.0834121
cpHydra k_401057561UNSAT 0.081987 0.0882179
bpsolver 2008-06-271057549UNSAT 0.12498 0.136374
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261057550UNSAT 1.19582 1.00689
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261057551UNSAT 1.2788 1.3321
Sugar v1.13+minisat1057548UNSAT 1.56076 1.35265
Sugar v1.13+picosat1057547UNSAT 1.89271 1.99852
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1057559UNSAT 3.2675 3.34395
casper zito1057557UNSAT 4.31534 4.322
Abscon 112v4 AC1057558UNSAT 5.14522 5.26608
casper zao1057556UNSAT 14.4138 14.5098
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106654? 0.332949 0.376027
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131057546? 1059.62 1066.97
galac M1057552? (problem) 60.7698 61.3552
galac E1057553? (problem) 61.7176 62.3436
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301057542? (TO) 1800.01 1802.52
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301057543? (TO) 1800.02 1803.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301057541? (TO) 1800.1 1808.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: