CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/jnhSat/
normalized-jnh01_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/jnhSat/
normalized-jnh01_ext.xml
MD5SUM8142ff6b7a459356f778fe9cbf27bb16
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.035993
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints850
Maximum constraint arity14
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension850
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141046667SAT 0.035993 0.0371599
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271046658SAT 0.039993 0.040062
Mistral-prime 1.3131046668SAT 0.039993 0.042962
cpHydra k_101046673SAT 0.047992 0.0504639
cpHydra k_401046674SAT 0.051991 0.0548039
MDG-probe 2008-06-271046657SAT 0.066989 0.068737
casper zito1046670SAT 0.096985 0.105104
spider 2008-06-141046656SAT 0.164974 0.185316
bpsolver 2008-06-271046662SAT 0.19297 0.202105
casper zao1046669SAT 0.195969 0.197422
mddc-solv 2008-06-091046655SAT 0.6539 0.683418
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301046654SAT 0.733888 0.628851
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301046653SAT 0.794878 0.73511
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105075SAT 0.857868 0.896725
Sugar v1.13+minisat1046661SAT 0.987849 1.09743
Sugar v1.13+picosat1046660SAT 1.02584 0.975707
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301046652SAT 1.04784 0.933715
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261046664SAT 1.11783 1.15481
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261046663SAT 1.17082 0.99124
Abscon 112v4 AC1046671SAT 1.3218 1.13941
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1046672SAT 1.37779 1.40937
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131046659SAT 1.81272 1.36396
galac M1046665SAT 5.53016 5.17853
galac E1046666SAT 6.03908 5.71003

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0