CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/BH-4-13/
normalized-BlackHole-4-13-e-1_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/BH-4-13/
normalized-BlackHole-4-13-e-1_ext.xml
MD5SUMd211ae6c6c79ecd682df2e7c9710a9e2
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.18597
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables208
Number of constraints4217
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size52
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4217
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038925UNSAT 0.18597 0.192627
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038924UNSAT 0.18697 0.193396
cpHydra k_101045581UNSAT 0.197969 0.206078
Mistral-option 1.3141038934UNSAT 0.197969 0.2056
cpHydra k_401046210UNSAT 0.199968 0.20594
Mistral-prime 1.3131038935UNSAT 0.200968 0.20621
bpsolver 2008-06-271038929UNSAT 0.624904 0.625825
Abscon 112v4 AC1044323UNSAT 1.27681 1.31329
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044952UNSAT 1.40579 1.47641
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038931UNSAT 1.83272 1.88737
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038930UNSAT 1.85972 1.93774
galac M1038932? (MO) 1771.6 1780.41
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038928? (TO) 1800.02 1809.22
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038920? (TO) 1800.03 1800.73
galac E1038933? (TO) 1800.04 1807.41
casper zao1043065? (TO) 1800.05 1806.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038918? (TO) 1800.07 1808.82
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104393? (TO) 1800.08 1800.81
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038919? (TO) 1800.09 1814.22
casper zito1043694? (TO) 1800.12 1809.82
spider 2008-06-141038921? (TO) 1800.12 1809.13
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038927? (TO) 1800.13 1815.22
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038926? (TO) 1800.16 1808.65

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: