CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/BH-4-13/
normalized-BlackHole-4-13-e-3_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/BH-4-13/
normalized-BlackHole-4-13-e-3_ext.xml
MD5SUM0d63c340aa2de5a517388f1f4a3c0ad6
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.183971
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables208
Number of constraints4217
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size52
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4217
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141038826UNSAT 0.183971 0.194376
cpHydra k_101045575UNSAT 0.184971 0.185482
Mistral-prime 1.3131038827UNSAT 0.18597 0.191889
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038816UNSAT 0.186971 0.193495
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038817UNSAT 0.18897 0.195135
cpHydra k_401046204UNSAT 0.18997 0.193237
bpsolver 2008-06-271038821UNSAT 0.590909 0.593686
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044946UNSAT 1.35679 1.42463
Abscon 112v4 AC1044317UNSAT 1.36779 1.40852
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038823UNSAT 1.57876 1.62885
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038822UNSAT 1.72174 1.77664
casper zito1043688? (TO) 1800.02 1808.22
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038812? (TO) 1800.03 1800.63
galac M1038824? (TO) 1800.03 1808.42
spider 2008-06-141038813? (TO) 1800.04 1809.13
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038819? (TO) 1800.05 1801.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038810? (TO) 1800.06 1816.52
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038820? (TO) 1800.06 1807.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038811? (TO) 1800.07 1802.83
galac E1038825? (TO) 1800.07 1808.81
casper zao1043059? (TO) 1800.07 1807.52
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104387? (TO) 1800.1 1801.01
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038818? (TO) 1800.2 1808.53

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: