CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/coloring/
normalized-geom-40-2-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/coloring/
normalized-geom-40-2-ext.xml
MD5SUM1cc053dec3f0d112864f71ec4f7b5d96
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.005998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints78
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension78
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038618UNSAT 0.005998 0.0151169
Mistral-prime 1.3131038629UNSAT 0.005998 0.013983
Mistral-option 1.3141038628UNSAT 0.006998 0.0137929
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038619UNSAT 0.007998 0.0139789
casper zao1043048UNSAT 0.009997 0.014573
casper zito1043677UNSAT 0.009998 0.0172349
spider 2008-06-141038615UNSAT 0.010998 0.012626
cpHydra k_101045564UNSAT 0.018996 0.0254109
cpHydra k_401046193UNSAT 0.020996 0.0190131
bpsolver 2008-06-271038623UNSAT 0.030994 0.0327639
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104376UNSAT 0.298954 0.332318
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038614UNSAT 0.336948 0.391019
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038625UNSAT 0.371943 0.361941
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038624UNSAT 0.435933 0.475709
galac M1038626UNSAT 0.476926 0.518013
galac E1038627UNSAT 0.483925 0.519192
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038621UNSAT 0.544916 0.65387
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038622UNSAT 0.563913 0.696418
Abscon 112v4 AC1044306UNSAT 0.678896 0.729822
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044935UNSAT 0.687895 0.730483
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038620UNSAT 0.71789 0.761963
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038612? (TO) 1800.01 1804.13
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038613? (TO) 1800.04 1817.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: