CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/coloring/
normalized-geom-30a-5-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/coloring/
normalized-geom-30a-5-ext.xml
MD5SUM7a6b06ef2be8f5292b87e3e5cd6ae261
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.006998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension81
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131038521UNSAT 0.006998 0.013912
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038511UNSAT 0.007998 0.014048
Mistral-option 1.3141038520UNSAT 0.007998 0.018625
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038510UNSAT 0.008998 0.0145829
casper zito1043671UNSAT 0.012997 0.0180649
cpHydra k_101045558UNSAT 0.017996 0.0240109
cpHydra k_401046187UNSAT 0.018996 0.019435
spider 2008-06-141038507UNSAT 0.019996 0.0255521
bpsolver 2008-06-271038515UNSAT 0.033994 0.0407579
casper zao1043042UNSAT 0.034994 0.037901
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104370UNSAT 0.312951 0.338176
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038506UNSAT 0.362944 0.424458
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038517UNSAT 0.38794 0.423069
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038516UNSAT 0.396938 0.423425
galac E1038519UNSAT 0.566913 0.635076
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038514UNSAT 0.582911 0.642499
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038513UNSAT 0.612906 0.673339
galac M1038518UNSAT 0.693893 0.730024
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044929UNSAT 0.702892 0.731646
Abscon 112v4 AC1044300UNSAT 0.744886 0.783474
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038512UNSAT 0.943855 1.13415
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038505? (TO) 1800.03 1808.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038504? (TO) 1800.04 1810.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: