CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/coloring/
normalized-myciel-5g-4-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/coloring/
normalized-myciel-5g-4-ext.xml
MD5SUM174aee4ff53d2fa062227496e7b76689
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.048992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables47
Number of constraints236
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension236
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141038502UNSAT 0.048992 0.054064
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038493UNSAT 0.051991 0.057893
Mistral-prime 1.3131038503UNSAT 0.053991 0.059755
cpHydra k_101045557UNSAT 0.062989 0.0682209
cpHydra k_401046186UNSAT 0.06399 0.066232
casper zito1043670UNSAT 0.064989 0.0653031
bpsolver 2008-06-271038497UNSAT 0.103983 0.109371
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038492UNSAT 0.12198 0.128639
casper zao1043041UNSAT 0.12498 0.130219
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038498UNSAT 0.563913 0.571433
spider 2008-06-141038489UNSAT 0.576911 0.585676
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038499UNSAT 0.578911 0.585323
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104369UNSAT 0.668897 0.69984
galac E1038501UNSAT 0.71189 0.749171
galac M1038500UNSAT 0.727888 0.759209
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038496UNSAT 0.758884 0.847805
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038488UNSAT 0.772882 0.789307
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038495UNSAT 0.809875 0.88394
Abscon 112v4 AC1044299UNSAT 0.924858 0.939129
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044928UNSAT 0.933858 0.989469
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038494UNSAT 2.09468 2.17325
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038486? (TO) 1800.06 1810.22
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038487? (TO) 1800.1 1807.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: