CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/marc/
normalized-large-92-unsat_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/marc/
normalized-large-92-unsat_ext.xml
MD5SUM8407841248ad00d5671b256d4829d1bf
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark12.5861
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables92
Number of constraints4186
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size92
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4186
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141038304UNSAT 12.5861 12.6044
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038295UNSAT 12.7971 12.9116
Mistral-prime 1.3131038305UNSAT 13.6239 13.7544
cpHydra k_401046175UNSAT 13.6549 13.9416
cpHydra k_101045546UNSAT 13.8309 13.9782
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038294UNSAT 15.6766 15.83
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044917UNSAT 16.3175 16.4634
Abscon 112v4 AC1044288UNSAT 16.5775 16.6229
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038301UNSAT 22.3296 22.388
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038300UNSAT 24.0723 24.3242
spider 2008-06-141038291UNSAT 38.7731 39.0809
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038290UNSAT 62.8434 62.9104
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038296UNSAT 63.7593 63.9948
galac M1038302? (problem) 318.085 319.966
galac E1038303? (problem) 319.299 322.44
bpsolver 2008-06-271038299? (problem) 348.758 350.325
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104358? (exit code) 34.3568 35.0662
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038297? (MO) 26.9258 28.4211
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038298? (MO) 28.36 28.9617
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038288? (TO) 1800.03 1801.12
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038289? (TO) 1800.05 1807.62
casper zito1043659Signal 21.0838 23.3292
casper zao1043030Signal 21.2298 22.2529

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: