CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-26/
normalized-rand-26-26-325-155-61021_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-26/
normalized-rand-26-26-325-155-61021_ext.xml
MD5SUM7e6a9f70634568dedad3cbac85bcc871
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark16.1865
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables26
Number of constraints325
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension325
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037503SAT 48.1087 48.5241
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037502SAT 56.5784 57.0601
Mistral-option 1.3141037512SAT 71.0982 71.3804
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037496SAT 99.6918 100.577
Mistral-prime 1.3131037513SAT 174.244 175.742
cpHydra k_101045502SAT 182.003 183.806
bpsolver 2008-06-271037507SAT 231.294 232.233
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037498SAT 285.284 286.748
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044873SAT 379.326 379.503
cpHydra k_401046131SAT 385.659 386.089
Abscon 112v4 AC1044244SAT 412.164 419.973
casper zito1043615SAT 461.776 463.632
spider 2008-06-141037499SAT 935.911 940.47
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037509SAT 1488.84 1489.59
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037508SAT 1558.72 1568.51
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037497? (TO) 1800.02 1800.92
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037505? (TO) 1800.03 1812.12
galac E1037511? (TO) 1800.05 1804.81
galac M1037510? (TO) 1800.08 1813.82
casper zao1042986? (TO) 1800.1 1806.91
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104314? (TO) 1800.12 1801.11
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037506? (TO) 1800.14 1802.93
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037504? (TO) 1800.15 1809.18

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
19 14 4 16 1 8 5 9 4 14 0 18 21 23 24 18 23 13 2 25 15 8 9 3 25 25