2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-160.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-160.xml
MD5SUM3ff67dee7a06e1e6311de3a7585abde9
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark146.729
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints53
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size534
Maximum domain size534
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":534,"count":50}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity50
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":51},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":50,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints52
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":52},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394999SAT 146.729 146.786
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387927SAT 245.808 242.026
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387926SAT 477.486 473.521
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392419SAT 1459.92 193.816
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392719SAT 1486.89 196.162
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405579SAT 1509.03 197.719
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405279SAT 1523.67 199.865
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398079? 361.171 361.356
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409339? 362.334 362.504
cosoco 2 (complete)4389519? (MO) 176.632 178.338
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408059? (MO) 184.607 186.381
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396799? (MO) 201.543 203.25
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386783? (NS) 0.013008 0.0135979
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390619? (TO) 2520.05 2515.81
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400779? (TO) 2520.08 2467.04
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395899? (TO) 2520.11 2468.33
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405879? (TO) 2520.12 2496.82
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402579? (TO) 2520.13 2467.75
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387211? (TO) 2520.14 2464.73
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398979? (TO) 2520.35 637.975
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393019? (TO) 2520.49 636.208
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403479? (TO) 2520.58 637.308
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406779? (TO) 19723.7 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404379? (TO) 19761.2 2520.14
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399579? (TO) 19815.5 2520.15
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393619? (TO) 19968.5 2520.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 209 81 345 193 345 193 220 149 209 149 149 149 81 0 258 0 94 210 0 210 201 363 360 345 0 
315 427 360 271 153 288 288 271 326 375 315 210 359 359 288 440 427 153 210 0 375 0 360 171 0   </values> </instantiation>