2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-152.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-152.xml
MD5SUM95353c685d9c4a971cd57b59ef19ccd8
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark69.0695
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints53
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size513
Maximum domain size513
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":513,"count":50}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity50
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":51},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":50,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints52
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":52},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394997SAT 69.0695 69.0816
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387923SAT 279.437 275.462
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387924SAT 1041.24 1036.43
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392717SAT 1151.2 152.247
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405277SAT 1161.88 152.308
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392417SAT 1177.68 153.11
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405577SAT 1226.29 163.272
cosoco 2 (complete)4389517? (exit code) 0.011988 0.0124261
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396797? (exit code) 0.012108 0.0123641
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408057? (exit code) 0.012626 0.012911
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398077? (exit code) 0.015462 0.015819
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409337? (exit code) 0.01587 0.016471
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386782? (NS) 0.012869 0.0131601
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387210? (TO) 2520.06 2468.33
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390617? (TO) 2520.08 2515.51
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395897? (TO) 2520.09 2470.93
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400777? (TO) 2520.09 2470.04
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402577? (TO) 2520.11 2470.33
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405877? (TO) 2520.13 2492.73
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398977? (TO) 2520.53 637.096
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393017? (TO) 2520.66 637.691
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403477? (TO) 2520.74 637.214
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406777? (TO) 19714.6 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404377? (TO) 19782.7 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399577? (TO) 19793.3 2520.14
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393617? (TO) 19938.5 2520.13

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 348 93 102 209 93 324 65 112 65 102 145 0 141 145 226 102 0 209 0 201 201 354 348 324 0 
153 340 339 415 349 300 340 339 303 300 368 303 300 432 415 201 201 300 368 153 0 0 159 324 0   </values> </instantiation>