2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-023.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-023.xml
MD5SUMf753def11f9f341c6e9dbf54b2480dee
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark88.5458
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables48
Number of constraints51
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size186
Maximum domain size186
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":186,"count":48}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":46},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity48
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":49},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":48,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints50
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":50},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394996SAT 88.5458 88.5557
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387921SAT 293.061 289.294
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387920SAT 493.738 489.875
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392416SAT 2580.54 334.295
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405576SAT 2607.95 332.34
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405276SAT 2659.71 345.39
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392716SAT 2704.26 354.091
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396796? (exit code) 0.011535 0.0116471
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408056? (exit code) 0.01154 0.011969
cosoco 2 (complete)4389516? (exit code) 0.01184 0.0123319
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398076? (exit code) 0.01348 0.014062
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409336? (exit code) 0.014253 0.0147749
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386781? (NS) 0.010484 0.010783
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387209? (TO) 2520.05 2468.73
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405876? (TO) 2520.06 2499.41
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390616? (TO) 2520.07 2513.02
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395896? (TO) 2520.08 2469.23
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402576? (TO) 2520.12 2468.73
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400776? (TO) 2520.13 2468.63
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398976? (TO) 2520.39 636.566
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403476? (TO) 2520.64 636.793
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393016? (TO) 2520.68 636.477
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404376? (TO) 19888 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399576? (TO) 19892.4 2520.1
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406776? (TO) 19902.7 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393616? (TO) 20003.2 2520.14

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 160 65 43 59 132 59 68 65 43 47 140 43 162 160 132 66 47 96 0 140 0 80 96 0  116 135 135
119 118 126 126 138 119 135 118 96 116 90 90 96 153 90 96 140 139 126 0 0   </values> </instantiation>