2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-142.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-142.xml
MD5SUM216ebd1a5dc9377e08f238421ffc41cf
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark46.3348
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints53
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size465
Maximum domain size465
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":465,"count":50}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity50
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":51},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":50,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints52
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":52},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394920SAT 46.3348 46.3519
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392340SAT 96.1696 16.4083
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392640SAT 96.3349 16.702
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405500SAT 96.595 16.5081
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405200SAT 97.9508 16.7976
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387915SAT 123.498 119.582
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387914SAT 172.031 168.362
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398000? 352.798 353.028
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409260? 359.333 359.521
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4407980? (MO) 172.671 174.349
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396720? (MO) 175.379 177.151
cosoco 2 (complete)4389440? (MO) 199.915 201.655
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386779? (NS) 0.012617 0.0130339
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405800? (TO) 2520.03 2492.22
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400700? (TO) 2520.05 2467.14
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402500? (TO) 2520.06 2470.93
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387207? (TO) 2520.1 2470.73
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395820? (TO) 2520.1 2471.83
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390540? (TO) 2520.11 2515.71
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4392940? (TO) 2520.51 637.57
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398900? (TO) 2520.63 636.804
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403400? (TO) 2520.64 636.69
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399500? (TO) 19789.1 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404300? (TO) 19811.7 2520.13
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406700? (TO) 19815.3 2520.1
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393540? (TO) 19884.6 2520.1

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 225 201 212 312 212 180 201 231 225 180 127 256 137 137 127 210 201 201 201 0 0 326 312 292
0  19 383 19 153 0 32 32 0 25 0 0 0 328 392 53 383 292 56 167 0 328 153 0 292 127   </values> </instantiation>