2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-033.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-033.xml
MD5SUM273a3a450a7af16ef80dfed9e1af494c
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark36.4974
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables48
Number of constraints51
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size288
Maximum domain size288
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":288,"count":48}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":46},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity48
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":49},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":48,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints50
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":50},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394916SAT 36.4974 36.5033
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387912SAT 44.4136 40.9122
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387911SAT 49.1518 46.11
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392636SAT 147.096 21.6499
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405196SAT 151.207 22.2902
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405496SAT 152.527 22.2181
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392336SAT 156.865 22.7779
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405796SAT 432.244 424.519
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398896SAT 1878.88 474.919
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403396SAT 1973.14 498.857
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4392936SAT 2056.89 520.243
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404296SAT 3686.79 470.689
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399496SAT 4401 560.815
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393536SAT 4682.48 594.412
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406696SAT 5421.62 691.614
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409256? 360.741 360.91
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4397996? 363.824 363.978
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396716? (MO) 174.934 176.66
cosoco 2 (complete)4389436? (MO) 175.142 176.942
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4407976? (MO) 175.97 177.684
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386778? (NS) 0.011169 0.0115549
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390536? (TO) 2520.03 2511.71
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395816? (TO) 2520.08 2466.23
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400696? (TO) 2520.1 2464.43
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402496? (TO) 2520.11 2470.73
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387206? (TO) 2520.14 2468.04

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 129 129 120 131 201 120 56 141 73 136 95 131 95 56 159 0 159 141 73 216 0 201 159 0  182
175 175 210 186 159 198 210 198 159 159 182 184 159 186 159 129 228 220 129 215 201 0 0   </values> </instantiation>