2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-203.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-203.xml
MD5SUMce251f4c9ae0df3aa97e9296eb89cd68
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark141.487
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints53
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size634
Maximum domain size634
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":634,"count":50}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity50
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":51},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":50,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints52
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":52},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394918SAT 141.487 141.517
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387905SAT 205.19 201.66
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387906SAT 435.502 431.209
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392638SAT 930.242 123.735
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392338SAT 941.647 125.877
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405498SAT 943.071 126.246
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405198SAT 943.165 126.572
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409258? 361.399 361.645
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4397998? 416.087 416.295
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396718? (MO) 180.519 182.335
cosoco 2 (complete)4389438? (MO) 180.694 182.349
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4407978? (MO) 180.841 182.545
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386776? (NS) 0.013684 0.0141369
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395818? (TO) 2520.04 2465.83
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387204? (TO) 2520.06 2468.14
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402498? (TO) 2520.07 2469.84
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400698? (TO) 2520.07 2471.83
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405798? (TO) 2520.08 2490.32
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390538? (TO) 2520.11 2514.81
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398898? (TO) 2520.29 637.185
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4392938? (TO) 2520.55 636.388
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403398? (TO) 2520.61 637.072
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399498? (TO) 19766.1 2520.14
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406698? (TO) 19836.9 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404298? (TO) 19838.4 2520.15
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393538? (TO) 20008.7 2520.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 234 292 318 292 309 249 309 353 342 249 399 161 239 318 161 353 234 239 0 462 234 407 0 399
0  327 265 241 239 265 239 298 407 241 282 235 327 160 160 239 298 342 0 239 235 461 407 400 0 0   </values> </instantiation>