2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-029.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-029.xml
MD5SUM46cde9b56a99396b1706cac103cc08fa
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark242.093
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables48
Number of constraints51
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size203
Maximum domain size203
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":203,"count":48}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":46},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity48
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":49},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":48,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints50
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":50},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392729SAT 242.093 33.4696
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392429SAT 244.654 33.8634
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405289SAT 244.861 34.0948
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405589SAT 245.585 34.2154
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4395009SAT 422.224 422.257
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387902SAT 492.524 488.557
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387903SAT 1478.18 1473.17
cosoco 2 (complete)4389529? (exit code) 0.011481 0.012065
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408069? (exit code) 0.011817 0.013675
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396809? (exit code) 0.011913 0.0122651
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409349? (exit code) 0.013896 0.0142829
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398089? (exit code) 0.016056 0.0164039
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386775? (NS) 0.010466 0.0109
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390629? (TO) 2520.05 2513.51
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395909? (TO) 2520.08 2471.33
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400789? (TO) 2520.08 2472.63
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387203? (TO) 2520.09 2467.33
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405889? (TO) 2520.12 2500.31
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402589? (TO) 2520.13 2472.14
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398989? (TO) 2520.5 636.687
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393029? (TO) 2520.54 636.093
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403489? (TO) 2520.56 636.2
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406789? (TO) 19887.1 2520.16
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399589? (TO) 19912.3 2520.1
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404389? (TO) 19913.5 2520.08
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393629? (TO) 19991.7 2520.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list>x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] x[9] x[10] x[11] x[12] x[13] x[14] x[15] x[16] x[17] x[18] x[19] x[20]
x[21] x[22] x[23] y[0] y[1] y[2] y[3] y[4] y[5] y[6] y[7] y[8] y[9] y[10] y[11] y[12] y[13] y[14] y[15] y[16] y[17] y[18] y[19] y[20] y[21]
y[22] y[23]</list> <values>155 136 172 44 94 123 138 105 136 156 54 177 94 172 123 44 136 54 0 155 0 78 105 0 146 145 167 159 105 130 130 98
147 146 145 146 116 172 98 169 167 105 159 98 105 145 0 0</values> </instantiation>