2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-154.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-154.xml
MD5SUM9c35d8cb8d03f0164c4f0b6ed4b5e670
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark369.492
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints53
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size524
Maximum domain size524
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":524,"count":50}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity50
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":51},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":50,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints52
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":52},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394986SAT 369.492 369.616
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387896SAT 431 427.226
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405566SAT 2787.99 358.703
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392406SAT 2797.63 361.86
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405266SAT 2808.08 361.861
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392706SAT 2854.27 377.014
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409326? 354.705 354.868
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398066? 358.686 358.895
cosoco 2 (complete)4389506? (MO) 175.776 177.54
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408046? (MO) 175.828 177.549
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396786? (MO) 178.736 180.563
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386773? (NS) 0.013023 0.013538
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387201? (TO) 2520.05 2465.73
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390606? (TO) 2520.06 2514.91
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400766? (TO) 2520.06 2470.33
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402566? (TO) 2520.08 2471.83
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405866? (TO) 2520.09 2491.82
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387897? (TO) 2520.11 2515.32
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395886? (TO) 2520.12 2472.73
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393006? (TO) 2520.48 638.693
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398966? (TO) 2520.51 638.598
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403466? (TO) 2520.61 638.489
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406766? (TO) 19782.6 2520.13
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399566? (TO) 19783.9 2520.14
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404366? (TO) 19798.9 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393606? (TO) 19916.1 2520.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 383 392 200 383 404 200 220 321 383 145 159 321 437 145 159 220 235 392 257 383 0 0 220 360
0  380 380 125 359 359 90 389 125 305 90 365 164 305 0 426 125 0 392 389 164 0 365 226 0 145   </values> </instantiation>