2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-199.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-199.xml
MD5SUM6632ff8405f31e2dfb2c2f75c1e4c1cc
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark17.4392
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints53
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size607
Maximum domain size607
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":607,"count":50}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity50
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":51},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":50,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints52
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":52},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394854SAT 17.4392 17.4444
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387893SAT 37.8423 34.3028
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387894SAT 48.3671 44.252
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405434SAT 145.659 23.136
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392574SAT 145.772 23.3859
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392274SAT 145.979 23.3743
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405134SAT 146.521 24.1176
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4397934? 349.177 349.38
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409194? 365.258 365.477
cosoco 2 (complete)4389374? (MO) 172.099 173.834
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4407914? (MO) 173.212 174.971
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396654? (MO) 174.16 175.968
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386772? (NS) 0.013633 0.014018
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395754? (TO) 2520.05 2466.23
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400634? (TO) 2520.07 2467.14
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390474? (TO) 2520.08 2515.51
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387200? (TO) 2520.11 2466.83
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402434? (TO) 2520.13 2470.64
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405734? (TO) 2520.13 2489.63
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398834? (TO) 2520.42 638.7
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403334? (TO) 2520.44 638.776
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4392874? (TO) 2520.57 636.979
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404234? (TO) 19785.4 2520.17
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399434? (TO) 19792.3 2520.09
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406634? (TO) 19806.9 2520.14
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393474? (TO) 19927.6 2520.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 179 84 401 179 160 160 160 246 353 192 353 84 0 192 0 92 246 283 246 0 411 402 401 185 0 
391 338 391 378 378 397 346 263 156 246 205 346 338 300 246 246 156 263 0 422 205 0 401 391 0   </values> </instantiation>