2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
RectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-126.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRectPacking/RectPacking-m1-perf/
RectPacking-perfect-126.xml
MD5SUMe5b164a238094fc306b5fb8652aa9c45
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark45.9191
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints53
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size398
Maximum domain size398
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":398,"count":50}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity50
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":51},{"arity":2,"count":1},{"arity":50,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints52
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":52},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4394883SAT 45.9191 45.9307
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387888SAT 47.0746 43.4582
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387887SAT 55.9715 52.2504
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392303SAT 310.942 42.605
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405463SAT 311.689 43.0952
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392603SAT 315.315 43.8529
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405163SAT 318.439 44.2209
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409223? 351.018 351.199
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4397963? 366.298 366.502
cosoco 2 (complete)4389403? (MO) 171.477 173.23
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4407943? (MO) 171.652 173.344
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396683? (MO) 179.598 181.345
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386770? (NS) 0.012006 0.012537
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390503? (TO) 2520.05 2515.31
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400663? (TO) 2520.05 2465.74
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402463? (TO) 2520.07 2472.94
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387198? (TO) 2520.07 2467.93
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405763? (TO) 2520.09 2494.14
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395783? (TO) 2520.14 2467.83
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398863? (TO) 2520.23 636.728
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403363? (TO) 2520.31 636.867
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4392903? (TO) 2520.68 635.974
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404263? (TO) 19818 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406663? (TO) 19826.5 2520.11
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399463? (TO) 19857 2520.11
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393503? (TO) 19891.6 2520.09

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> y[] x[]  </list> <values> 152 249 145 238 249 238 255 210 249 210 210 99 99 154 152 145 210 0 154 145 278 264 254 0 0
 154 229 207 229 264 212 212 212 235 240 100 207 154 100 156 214 144 154 0 279 144 264 0 253 0   </values> </instantiation>