2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Tpp/Tpp-zinc-s1/
Tpp-6-3-30-1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTpp/Tpp-zinc-s1/
Tpp-6-3-30-1.xml
MD5SUMf61e90724cd8b66989ec046e8a3ea41c
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark164
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.325758
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables96
Number of constraints590
Number of domains50
Minimum domain size3
Maximum domain size18
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":3,"count":6},{"size":4,"count":9},{"size":5,"count":3},{"size":7,"count":1},{"size":9,"count":2},{"size":10,"count":3},{"size":11,"count":9},{"size":12,"count":9},{"size":13,"count":5},{"size":14,"count":1},{"size":17,"count":30},{"size":18,"count":18}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree33
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":48},{"degree":19,"count":30},{"degree":32,"count":17},{"degree":33,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity18
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":1},{"arity":2,"count":588},{"arity":18,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints48
Number of intensional constraints541
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":48},{"type":"intension","count":541},{"type":"circuit","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4397051OPT164 0.325758 0.326252
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408311OPT164 0.327922 0.333262
cosoco 2 (complete)4389771OPT164 0.372801 0.373235
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409591OPT164 0.91111 0.332489
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398331OPT164 1.0032 0.343073
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4406131OPT164 3.44934 1.26811
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390871OPT164 6.87411 3.25898
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393271OPT164 8.81271 2.89493
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4399231OPT164 10.2094 3.32164
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399831OPT164 10.565 2.51063
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4407031OPT164 10.5772 2.53273
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402831OPT164 10.5945 4.46662
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393871OPT164 10.9213 2.52747
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4401031OPT164 11.9114 5.04954
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4396151OPT164 15.0714 6.12539
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4395251OPT164 15.3013 15.3076
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387161Wrong Opt.204 10.1484 4.30036
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403731Wrong Opt.240 5.25959 1.75751
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404631Wrong Opt.240 7.88116 2.01167

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 164
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='164'> <list>c[0] c[10] c[11] c[12] c[13] c[14] c[15] c[16] c[17] c[18] c[19] c[1] c[20] c[21] c[22]
c[23] c[24] c[25] c[26] c[27] c[28] c[29] c[2] c[3] c[4] c[5] c[6] c[7] c[8] c[9] d[0] d[10] d[11] d[12] d[13] d[14] d[15] d[16] d[17] d[1]
d[2] d[3] d[4] d[5] d[6] d[7] d[8] d[9] l[0] l[10] l[11] l[12] l[13] l[14] l[15] l[16] l[17] l[18] l[19] l[1] l[20] l[21] l[22] l[23] l[24]
l[25] l[26] l[27] l[28] l[29] l[2] l[3] l[4] l[5] l[6] l[7] l[8] l[9] s[0] s[10] s[11] s[12] s[13] s[14] s[15] s[16] s[17] s[1] s[2] s[3]
s[4] s[5] s[6] s[7] s[8] s[9] </list> <values>4 3 3 7 4 1 4 5 1 4 2 4 9 1 2 1 7 2 2 3 4 10 7 6 8 4 2 1 4 8 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 13 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 6 9 10 10 9 16 9 11 11 10 9 16 9 16 11 11 15 15 10 10 16 9 16 15 16 11 16 15 15 9 11 0 11 17 12 13 14 9 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 </values>
</instantiation>