2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GraphColoring/GraphColoring-m1-mono/
GraphColoring-david.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGraphColoring/GraphColoring-m1-mono/
GraphColoring-david.xml
MD5SUM8881d200d983e9a0f6a660f33978a65e
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark10
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark8.86427
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables87
Number of constraints406
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size87
Maximum domain size87
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":87,"count":87}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree83
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":10},{"degree":3,"count":5},{"degree":4,"count":7},{"degree":5,"count":5},{"degree":6,"count":6},{"degree":7,"count":10},{"degree":8,"count":4},{"degree":9,"count":5},{"degree":10,"count":9},{"degree":11,"count":1},{"degree":12,"count":4},{"degree":13,"count":2},{"degree":15,"count":3},{"degree":16,"count":2},{"degree":17,"count":4},{"degree":18,"count":2},{"degree":19,"count":1},{"degree":20,"count":1},{"degree":22,"count":1},{"degree":29,"count":1},{"degree":31,"count":1},{"degree":32,"count":1},{"degree":36,"count":1},{"degree":83,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity2
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":406}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints406
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":406}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin MAXIMUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4395171OPT10 8.86427 8.86548
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402751OPT10 9.38321 4.11989
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400951OPT10 10.1996 4.2515
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4387012OPT10 10.9611 4.43579
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4396071OPT10 17.1731 9.35269
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390791OPT10 82.4183 80.9152
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396971OPT10 83.4119 83.4174
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408231OPT10 84.1548 84.1524
cosoco 2 (complete)4389691OPT10 84.1814 84.1761
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4406051OPT10 285.693 282.222
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403651OPT10 475.977 120.553
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4399151OPT10 482.211 122.091
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393191OPT10 530.859 168.708
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398251OPT10 814.041 101.997
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409511OPT10 846.606 106.065
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393791OPT10 942.434 119.394
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404551OPT10 978.27 124.789
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406951OPT10 1092.55 138.672
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399751OPT10 1163.98 147.765

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 10
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> x[]  </list> <values> 6 3 3 9 4 1 1 1 6 8 2 10 4 1 5 8 2 7 7 3 7 4 6 3 4 4 2 1 8 1 2 8 2 6 2 8 10 4 9 4 4 9 1 1 8 5 3
4 4 9 8 1 6 1 1 9 3 5 2 5 1 4 1 4 4 10 5 2 6 9 8 10 3 2 4 7 5 8 2 4 5 4 0 1 0 4 4   </values> </instantiation>