2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
StripPacking/StripPacking-m1-seriesT/
StripPacking-T1e.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameStripPacking/StripPacking-m1-seriesT/
StripPacking-T1e.xml
MD5SUMf7b8b642e131c8af917aaf97f4ae3b24
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark123.921
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables85
Number of constraints52
Number of domains19
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size200
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":51},{"size":200,"count":34}]
Minimum variable degree1
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":1,"count":17},{"degree":2,"count":34},{"degree":3,"count":34}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity68
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":34},{"arity":3,"count":17},{"arity":68,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints17
Number of intensional constraints34
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":17},{"type":"intension","count":34},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405621SAT 123.921 19.7038
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405321SAT 124.184 20.0173
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392761SAT 125.185 19.189
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392461SAT 125.564 18.7545
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387581SAT 135.708 132.033
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387582SAT 137.622 133.673
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4395041SAT 300.309 300.305
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396841? 503.484 503.757
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408101? 503.842 504.089
cosoco 2 (complete)4389561? 577.384 577.606
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409381? 978.012 978.38
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398121? 992.886 993.369
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386668? (NS) 0.015098 0.206623
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390661? (TO) 2520.04 2515.21
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405921? (TO) 2520.06 2499.03
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400821? (TO) 2520.07 2466.83
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395941? (TO) 2520.07 2467.53
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402621? (TO) 2520.12 2469.23
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4386998? (TO) 2520.13 2466.43
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393061? (TO) 2520.44 635.673
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403521? (TO) 2520.58 635.797
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4399021? (TO) 2520.58 636.392
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399621? (TO) 19985.9 2520.11
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406821? (TO) 19992.6 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404421? (TO) 19993.9 2520.12
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393661? (TO) 20023 2520.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list>x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] x[9] x[10] x[11] x[12] x[13] x[14] x[15] x[16] y[0] y[1] y[2] y[3] y[4]
y[5] y[6] y[7] y[8] y[9] y[10] y[11] y[12] y[13] y[14] y[15] y[16] w[0] w[1] w[2] w[3] w[4] w[5] w[6] w[7] w[8] w[9] w[10] w[11] w[12] w[13]
w[14] w[15] w[16] h[0] h[1] h[2] h[3] h[4] h[5] h[6] h[7] h[8] h[9] h[10] h[11] h[12] h[13] h[14] h[15] h[16] r[0] r[1] r[2] r[3] r[4] r[5]
r[6] r[7] r[8] r[9] r[10] r[11] r[12] r[13] r[14] r[15] r[16]</list> <values>61 115 115 140 140 159 159 180 180 191 61 37 32 0 0 32 0 0 49
28 156 49 35 28 61 35 28 28 169 106 0 189 169 106 139 25 44 60 19 21 32 20 11 9 54 78 83 61 37 5 32 28 151 21 44 107 121 7 95 26 33 78 31 63
106 11 20 83 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1</values> </instantiation>