2019 XCSP3 competition: main track (CSP and COP, sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
StripPacking/StripPacking-m1-seriesN/
StripPacking-N1c.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameStripPacking/StripPacking-m1-seriesN/
StripPacking-N1c.xml
MD5SUM19f4dcf35e46defaa68e633424c84ce1
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark122.854
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables85
Number of constraints52
Number of domains19
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size200
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":51},{"size":200,"count":34}]
Minimum variable degree1
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":1,"count":17},{"degree":2,"count":34},{"degree":3,"count":34}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity68
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":34},{"arity":3,"count":17},{"arity":68,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints17
Number of intensional constraints34
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":17},{"type":"intension","count":34},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392425SAT 122.854 18.8624
Fun-sCOP order+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405285SAT 125.304 20.6524
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-09-22) (complete)4405585SAT 126.491 20.6603
Fun-sCOP hybrid+ManyGlucose (2019-06-15) (complete)4392725SAT 126.926 19.254
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4395005SAT 148.904 148.908
Fun-sCOP hybrid+CryptoMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387576SAT 346.38 342.367
Fun-sCOP order+GlueMiniSat (2019-06-15) (complete)4387575SAT 652.589 648.936
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398085? 848.375 848.73
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409345? 862.523 862.831
cosoco 2 (complete)4389525? (MO) 426.778 428.583
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408065? (MO) 430.31 432.293
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4396805? (MO) 440.295 442.195
BTD 19.07.01 (complete)4386666? (NS) 0.015455 0.254235
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4402585? (TO) 2520.05 2469.04
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4390625? (TO) 2520.05 2513.21
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4405885? (TO) 2520.07 2480.51
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4386996? (TO) 2520.11 2466.53
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4400785? (TO) 2520.11 2466.53
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4395905? (TO) 2520.14 2470.04
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4393025? (TO) 2520.47 635.288
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403485? (TO) 2520.5 635.479
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4398985? (TO) 2520.59 635.478
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404385? (TO) 20014.4 2520.11
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4399585? (TO) 20015.5 2520.11
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4406785? (TO) 20031.8 2520.14
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4393625? (TO) 20041.8 2520.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list>x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] x[9] x[10] x[11] x[12] x[13] x[14] x[15] x[16] y[0] y[1] y[2] y[3] y[4]
y[5] y[6] y[7] y[8] y[9] y[10] y[11] y[12] y[13] y[14] y[15] y[16] w[0] w[1] w[2] w[3] w[4] w[5] w[6] w[7] w[8] w[9] w[10] w[11] w[12] w[13]
w[14] w[15] w[16] h[0] h[1] h[2] h[3] h[4] h[5] h[6] h[7] h[8] h[9] h[10] h[11] h[12] h[13] h[14] h[15] h[16] r[0] r[1] r[2] r[3] r[4] r[5]
r[6] r[7] r[8] r[9] r[10] r[11] r[12] r[13] r[14] r[15] r[16]</list> <values>17 0 52 130 88 12 0 52 77 12 174 130 0 88 0 79 79 0 0 0 78 49
54 54 81 81 86 0 49 96 0 136 136 166 35 17 36 70 42 5 12 25 11 40 26 44 77 86 79 9 121 86 54 81 88 117 32 42 15 55 10 78 29 40 49 64 30 34 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0</values> </instantiation>