2019 XCSP3 competition: mini-solver track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Rlfap_mini/Rlfap-dec-scens11_mini/
Rlfap-ext-scen-11-f04_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRlfap_mini/Rlfap-dec-scens11_mini/
Rlfap-ext-scen-11-f04_c18.xml
MD5SUM297c804b8c4092219cf99e305dde67fa
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark4.9855
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables680
Number of constraints4103
Number of domains5
Minimum domain size6
Maximum domain size40
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":6,"count":2},{"size":22,"count":14},{"size":33,"count":336},{"size":40,"count":328}]
Minimum variable degree1
Maximum variable degree62
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":1,"count":1},{"degree":3,"count":26},{"degree":4,"count":13},{"degree":5,"count":86},{"degree":6,"count":20},{"degree":7,"count":89},{"degree":8,"count":12},{"degree":9,"count":87},{"degree":10,"count":28},{"degree":11,"count":42},{"degree":12,"count":25},{"degree":13,"count":40},{"degree":14,"count":14},{"degree":15,"count":40},{"degree":16,"count":8},{"degree":17,"count":29},{"degree":18,"count":6},{"degree":19,"count":18},{"degree":20,"count":13},{"degree":21,"count":11},{"degree":22,"count":7},{"degree":23,"count":7},{"degree":24,"count":8},{"degree":25,"count":8},{"degree":27,"count":9},{"degree":28,"count":8},{"degree":29,"count":2},{"degree":30,"count":6},{"degree":31,"count":1},{"degree":35,"count":3},{"degree":36,"count":3},{"degree":38,"count":2},{"degree":39,"count":2},{"degree":42,"count":1},{"degree":43,"count":1},{"degree":44,"count":1},{"degree":47,"count":1},{"degree":55,"count":1},{"degree":62,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity2
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":4103}]
Number of extensional constraints4103
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":4103}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NACRE 1.0.5-Hybrid (complete)4391400UNSAT 4.9855 4.98607
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4397280UNSAT 25.6362 25.638
cosoco 2 (complete)4390000UNSAT 25.6538 25.6539
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408540UNSAT 27.325 27.3288
(reference) PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4407881UNSAT 37.9183 37.931
NACRE 1.0.5 (complete)4391600UNSAT 110.35 110.341
miniBTD 19.06.16 (complete)4391800UNSAT 289.421 289.442

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found: