2019 XCSP3 competition: mini-solver track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Primes/
Primes-m1-p30/Primes-30-80-3-7.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NamePrimes/
Primes-m1-p30/Primes-30-80-3-7.xml
MD5SUMd6f47189ec9a9650b4b34af3081cbaad
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.237203
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints80
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size112
Maximum domain size112
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":112,"count":100}]
Minimum variable degree1
Maximum variable degree12
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":1,"count":3},{"degree":2,"count":3},{"degree":3,"count":7},{"degree":4,"count":26},{"degree":5,"count":14},{"degree":6,"count":23},{"degree":7,"count":15},{"degree":8,"count":2},{"degree":9,"count":2},{"degree":10,"count":3},{"degree":11,"count":1},{"degree":12,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity10
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":10},{"arity":4,"count":9},{"arity":5,"count":13},{"arity":6,"count":3},{"arity":7,"count":12},{"arity":8,"count":9},{"arity":9,"count":11},{"arity":10,"count":13}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"sum","count":80}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NACRE 1.0.5-Hybrid (complete)4391495SAT 0.237203 0.237579
NACRE 1.0.5 (complete)4391695SAT 0.2976 0.297751
miniBTD 19.06.16 (complete)4391895SAT 0.353284 0.353547
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408635SAT 1.23907 1.34953
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4397375SAT 1.23953 1.23901
cosoco 2 (complete)4390095SAT 1.24955 1.25004
(reference) PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4407690SAT 114.646 114.65

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] x[9] x[10] x[11] x[12] x[13] x[14] x[15] x[16] x[17] x[18] x[19] x[20]
x[21] x[22] x[23] x[24] x[25] x[26] x[27] x[28] x[29] x[30] x[31] x[32] x[33] x[34] x[35] x[36] x[37] x[38] x[39] x[40] x[41] x[42] x[43]
x[44] x[45] x[46] x[47] x[48] x[49] x[50] x[51] x[52] x[53] x[54] x[55] x[56] x[57] x[58] x[59] x[60] x[61] x[62] x[63] x[64] x[65] x[66]
x[67] x[68] x[69] x[70] x[71] x[72] x[73] x[74] x[75] x[76] x[77] x[78] x[79] x[80] x[81] x[82] x[83] x[84] x[85] x[86] x[87] x[88] x[89]
x[90] x[91] x[92] x[93] x[94] x[95] x[96] x[97] x[98] x[99] </list> <values> 43 59 107 101 89 101 59 41 29 3 5 19 73 71 89 59 2 17 83 59 37
23 107 29 5 73 5 43 19 101 113 41 41 67 113 107 43 59 3 83 29 7 79 113 47 19 23 47 13 2 89 59 3 73 103 7 5 73 59 3 53 53 47 107 103 13 59 29
43 61 97 53 41 53 47 107 47 47 7 73 19 67 17 23 23 97 7 37 47 71 41 2 103 67 71 83 59 17 97 113 </values> </instantiation>