2019 XCSP3 competition: mini-solver track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
LowAutocorrelation/LowAutocorrelation-m1-s1/
LowAutocorrelation-019.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameLowAutocorrelation/LowAutocorrelation-m1-s1/
LowAutocorrelation-019.xml
MD5SUM4db16cf953bf17f15cb901b9adc08541
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark29
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark32.2315
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables379
Number of constraints207
Number of domains37
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size37
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":191},{"size":3,"count":2},{"size":4,"count":1},{"size":5,"count":2},{"size":6,"count":1},{"size":7,"count":2},{"size":8,"count":1},{"size":9,"count":2},{"size":10,"count":1},{"size":11,"count":2},{"size":12,"count":1},{"size":13,"count":2},{"size":14,"count":1},{"size":15,"count":2},{"size":16,"count":1},{"size":17,"count":2},{"size":18,"count":1},{"size":19,"count":2},{"size":21,"count":1},{"size":23,"count":1},{"size":25,"count":1},{"size":27,"count":1},{"size":29,"count":1},{"size":31,"count":1},{"size":33,"count":1},{"size":35,"count":1},{"size":37,"count":1}]
Minimum variable degree0
Maximum variable degree18
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":0,"count":153},{"degree":2,"count":207},{"degree":18,"count":19}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity19
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":19},{"arity":3,"count":172},{"arity":4,"count":1},{"arity":5,"count":1},{"arity":6,"count":1},{"arity":7,"count":1},{"arity":8,"count":1},{"arity":9,"count":1},{"arity":10,"count":1},{"arity":11,"count":1},{"arity":12,"count":1},{"arity":13,"count":1},{"arity":14,"count":1},{"arity":15,"count":1},{"arity":16,"count":1},{"arity":17,"count":1},{"arity":18,"count":1},{"arity":19,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints189
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":189},{"type":"sum","count":18}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
(reference) PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4407648OPT29 32.2315 32.2372
cosoco 2 (complete)4394727OPT29 133.222 133.234
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4397543OPT29 133.396 133.399
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408803OPT29 133.545 133.549

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 29
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> s[] c[] y[][] x[]  </list> <values> 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 9 0 1 4 1 0 1 4 1 4 1  0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 -3 0 -1 2 -1 0 -1 -2 -1 -2 -1
 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 -1 1
1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 1
-1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1  -1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1   </values> </instantiation>