2019 XCSP3 competition: mini-solver track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
PropStress/PropStress-m1-s1/
PropStress-0200.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NamePropStress/PropStress-m1-s1/
PropStress-0200.xml
MD5SUM0d3e60901fc96036944749fe1efc55c4
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark72.3833
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables402
Number of constraints20501
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size40001
Maximum domain size40001
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":40001,"count":402}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree201
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":1},{"degree":3,"count":199},{"degree":200,"count":199},{"degree":201,"count":3}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity2
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":20501}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints20501
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":20501}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
(reference) PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4407632UNSAT 72.3833 72.3746
miniBTD 19.06.16 (complete)4391827UNSAT 588.109 593.447
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408567? (TO) 2400.02 2399.8
NACRE 1.0.5-Hybrid (complete)4391427? (TO) 2400.02 2400.71
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4397307? (TO) 2400.04 2399.8
NACRE 1.0.5 (complete)4391627? (TO) 2400.04 2400.12
cosoco 2 (complete)4390027? (TO) 2400.06 2400.2

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found: