2019 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Tpp/Tpp-zinc-s1/
Tpp-3-5-30-1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTpp/Tpp-zinc-s1/
Tpp-3-5-30-1.xml
MD5SUMe91753cc37d5672b16b54feba0c5cd89
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark171
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.215432
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables90
Number of constraints497
Number of domains47
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size15
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":1},{"size":3,"count":3},{"size":4,"count":8},{"size":5,"count":4},{"size":8,"count":2},{"size":9,"count":5},{"size":10,"count":9},{"size":11,"count":11},{"size":12,"count":2},{"size":14,"count":30},{"size":15,"count":15}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree33
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":45},{"degree":16,"count":30},{"degree":32,"count":14},{"degree":33,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity15
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":1},{"arity":2,"count":495},{"arity":15,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints45
Number of intensional constraints451
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":45},{"type":"intension","count":451},{"type":"circuit","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4409001OPT171 0.215432 0.215759
cosoco 2 (complete)4390281OPT171 0.217018 0.21849
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4397741OPT171 0.219502 0.219654
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398641OPT171 0.344778 0.23375
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409901OPT171 0.349001 0.22464
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4406441OPT171 2.78751 1.06395
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4391181OPT171 5.82816 2.93067
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4400441OPT171 6.14551 2.05095
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4394181OPT171 6.58683 2.20834
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4407341OPT171 8.98348 2.11246
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4394481OPT171 9.15618 2.13596
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4400141OPT171 9.71619 2.30084
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4403141OPT171 9.96028 4.24019
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4401341OPT171 10.6335 4.30962
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4396461OPT171 13.8174 5.46202
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4395561OPT171 19.6245 19.6323
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4392081Wrong Opt.176 8.89616 3.89997
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4404041Wrong UNSAT 3.93433 1.40081
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404941Wrong UNSAT 6.52264 1.70281

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 171
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='171'> <list>c[0] c[10] c[11] c[12] c[13] c[14] c[15] c[16] c[17] c[18] c[19] c[1] c[20] c[21] c[22]
c[23] c[24] c[25] c[26] c[27] c[28] c[29] c[2] c[3] c[4] c[5] c[6] c[7] c[8] c[9] d[0] d[10] d[11] d[12] d[13] d[14] d[1] d[2] d[3] d[4]
d[5] d[6] d[7] d[8] d[9] l[0] l[10] l[11] l[12] l[13] l[14] l[15] l[16] l[17] l[18] l[19] l[1] l[20] l[21] l[22] l[23] l[24] l[25] l[26]
l[27] l[28] l[29] l[2] l[3] l[4] l[5] l[6] l[7] l[8] l[9] s[0] s[10] s[11] s[12] s[13] s[14] s[1] s[2] s[3] s[4] s[5] s[6] s[7] s[8] s[9]
</list> <values>1 4 4 10 9 4 2 2 3 1 5 4 1 1 2 3 1 4 5 1 2 2 2 3 4 2 2 5 4 1 0 1 4 0 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 17 13 20 3 6 9 9 9 6 8 8 6 7 7 8 8 13 13
8 6 9 11 11 10 13 7 7 7 9 11 8 13 10 6 0 13 8 12 14 11 1 2 3 4 5 9 6 7 10 </values> </instantiation>