2019 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Scheduling/Scheduling-os-taillard/
Taillard-os-05-05-1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameScheduling/Scheduling-os-taillard/
Taillard-os-05-05-1.xml
MD5SUM3747a76ad44ca32161ac6cfee5e9d7cb
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark262
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark28.3402
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables105
Number of constraints90
Number of domains7
Minimum domain size4
Maximum domain size362
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":4,"count":5},{"size":5,"count":45},{"size":362,"count":55}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree6
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":30},{"degree":3,"count":50},{"degree":6,"count":25}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity7
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":5},{"arity":2,"count":25},{"arity":3,"count":25},{"arity":5,"count":10},{"arity":7,"count":25}]
Number of extensional constraints25
Number of intensional constraints30
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":25},{"type":"intension","count":30},{"type":"allDifferent","count":5},{"type":"noOverlap","count":5},{"type":"element","count":25}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin MAXIMUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2019-09-12 (complete)4395468OPT262 28.3402 28.3374
choco-solver 2019-09-20 (complete)4403948OPT262 92.9116 23.7663
choco-solver 2019-09-16 (complete)4400348OPT262 125.245 31.8929
choco-solver 2019-06-14 parallel (complete)4394388OPT262 134.287 20.2875
choco-solver 2019-09-20 parallel (complete)4404848OPT262 152.189 19.8341
choco-solver 2019-09-16 parallel (complete)4400048OPT262 176.656 22.8643
choco-solver 2019-09-24 (complete)4406348OPT262 200.337 191.932
choco-solver 2019-09-24 parallel (complete)4407248OPT262 239.548 30.7793
choco-solver 2019-06-14 (complete)4394088OPT262 240.444 145.535
AbsCon 2019-07-23 (complete)4391088OPT262 518.175 512.854
Concrete 3.10 (complete)4391988OPT262 755.898 731.096
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4401248OPT262 797.676 770.068
Concrete 3.12.3 (complete)4403048OPT262 1190.08 1166.82
cosoco 2.O parallel (complete)4398548SAT (TO)262 2012.51 252.021
cosoco 2.0 parallel (complete)4409808SAT (TO)262 2012.59 252.021
Concrete 3.12.2 (complete)4396368SAT (TO)262 2400.13 2348.53
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4408908SAT (TO)276 2400.01 2401.01
cosoco 2 (complete)4390188SAT (TO)276 2400.01 2399.9
cosoco 2.0 (complete)4397648SAT (TO)276 2400.07 2400.3

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 262
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> w[][] s[][] d[][] e[] sd[][]  </list> <values> 1 2 0 3 4 4 3 0 2 1 0 1 4 2 3 2 0 4 1 3 3 1 4 2 0  2 40 128 147 230 4
56 162 176 240 29 70 157 240 261 0 40 120 153 240 0 55 70 121 176  38 81 19 83 32 52 90 6 64 22 8 83 35 15 1 40 71 33 87 21 55 15 42 55 86 
262 262 262 261 262  128 2 40 147 230 162 240 176 56 4 29 70 240 261 157 40 153 0 240 120 176 55 121 0 70   </values> </instantiation>