2018 XCSP3 competition: parallel solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
SocialGolfers/
SocialGolfers-5-5-6-cp_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameSocialGolfers/
SocialGolfers-5-5-6-cp_c18.xml
MD5SUM7cf8ff1aade64c35eba6df9cb38cb5a8
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark13.243
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables150
Number of constraints4508
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size5
Maximum domain size5
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":5,"count":150}]
Minimum variable degree122
Maximum variable degree123
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":122,"count":125},{"degree":123,"count":25}]
Minimum constraint arity4
Maximum constraint arity150
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":4,"count":4500},{"arity":25,"count":7},{"arity":150,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints4500
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":4500},{"type":"lex","count":1},{"type":"cardinality","count":6},{"type":"instantiation","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-08-14 (complete)4309096SAT 13.243 4.24881
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-07-02 (complete)4291327SAT 14.0068 3.73719
scop order+glucose-syrup (2018-07-07) (complete)4297005SAT 16.9217 4.98373
scop order+glucose-syrup (2018-07-31) (complete)4307189SAT 17.4628 5.78682
scop both+glucose-syrup (2018-07-31) (complete)4307425SAT 18.0042 5.89116
scop both+glucose-syrup (2018-07-07) (complete)4297241SAT 18.044 5.1877
Choco-solver 4.0.7b par (e747e1e) (complete)4297740SAT 30.118 9.18221

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> x[0][0] x[0][1] x[0][2] x[0][3] x[0][4] x[0][5] x[0][6] x[0][7] x[0][8] x[0][9] x[0][10] x[0][11] x[0][12] x[0][13]
x[0][14] x[0][15] x[0][16] x[0][17] x[0][18] x[0][19] x[0][20] x[0][21] x[0][22] x[0][23] x[0][24] x[1][0] x[1][1] x[1][2] x[1][3] x[1][4]
x[1][5] x[1][6] x[1][7] x[1][8] x[1][9] x[1][10] x[1][11] x[1][12] x[1][13] x[1][14] x[1][15] x[1][16] x[1][17] x[1][18] x[1][19] x[1][20]
x[1][21] x[1][22] x[1][23] x[1][24] x[2][0] x[2][1] x[2][2] x[2][3] x[2][4] x[2][5] x[2][6] x[2][7] x[2][8] x[2][9] x[2][10] x[2][11]
x[2][12] x[2][13] x[2][14] x[2][15] x[2][16] x[2][17] x[2][18] x[2][19] x[2][20] x[2][21] x[2][22] x[2][23] x[2][24] x[3][0] x[3][1] x[3][2]
x[3][3] x[3][4] x[3][5] x[3][6] x[3][7] x[3][8] x[3][9] x[3][10] x[3][11] x[3][12] x[3][13] x[3][14] x[3][15] x[3][16] x[3][17] x[3][18]
x[3][19] x[3][20] x[3][21] x[3][22] x[3][23] x[3][24] x[4][0] x[4][1] x[4][2] x[4][3] x[4][4] x[4][5] x[4][6] x[4][7] x[4][8] x[4][9]
x[4][10] x[4][11] x[4][12] x[4][13] x[4][14] x[4][15] x[4][16] x[4][17] x[4][18] x[4][19] x[4][20] x[4][21] x[4][22] x[4][23] x[4][24]
x[5][0] x[5][1] x[5][2] x[5][3] x[5][4] x[5][5] x[5][6] x[5][7] x[5][8] x[5][9] x[5][10] x[5][11] x[5][12] x[5][13] x[5][14] x[5][15]
x[5][16] x[5][17] x[5][18] x[5][19] x[5][20] x[5][21] x[5][22] x[5][23] x[5][24] </list> <values> 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4
4 4 4 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 1 3 4 3 4 0 2 1 4 0 2 1 3 2 1 3 4 0 1 3 4 0 2 0 2 1 3 4 4 0 2 1 3 1 3 4 0 2 3
4 0 2 1 2 1 3 4 0 0 2 4 3 1 4 3 1 0 2 2 4 3 1 0 1 0 2 4 3 3 1 0 2 4 4 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 4 1 0 4 3 2 2 1 0 4 3 0 4 3 2 1 </values>
</instantiation>