2018 XCSP3 competition: parallel solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Fapp/Fapp-m2s/
Fapp-m2s-20-0420_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameFapp/Fapp-m2s/
Fapp-m2s-20-0420_c18.xml
MD5SUMa9a1ecda6b6f8f1e99c2d233168bcaa1
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark589221986
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2883.99
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables7590
Number of constraints4736
Number of domains77
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size151
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":5},{"size":2,"count":2665},{"size":11,"count":2250},{"size":12,"count":1},{"size":25,"count":16},{"size":29,"count":112},{"size":33,"count":7},{"size":35,"count":61},{"size":39,"count":31},{"size":41,"count":3},{"size":44,"count":12},{"size":45,"count":29},{"size":47,"count":9},{"size":48,"count":23},{"size":49,"count":22},{"size":50,"count":3},{"size":51,"count":51},{"size":52,"count":61},{"size":54,"count":8},{"size":57,"count":6},{"size":58,"count":4},{"size":59,"count":3},{"size":60,"count":3},{"size":61,"count":12},{"size":63,"count":25},"...",{"size":92,"count":2}, {"size":93,"count":25}, {"size":97,"count":3}, {"size":101,"count":4}, {"size":102,"count":9}, {"size":103,"count":191}, {"size":105,"count":1}, {"size":108,"count":5}, {"size":109,"count":2}, {"size":111,"count":1}, {"size":112,"count":6}, {"size":115,"count":10}, {"size":116,"count":22}, {"size":118,"count":95}, {"size":122,"count":59}, {"size":123,"count":1}, {"size":124,"count":1}, {"size":125,"count":117}, {"size":126,"count":92}, {"size":127,"count":5}, {"size":137,"count":27}, {"size":138,"count":29}, {"size":140,"count":24}, {"size":141,"count":77}, {"size":151,"count":1259}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree2251
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":6752},{"degree":3,"count":9},{"degree":4,"count":14},{"degree":5,"count":23},{"degree":6,"count":28},{"degree":7,"count":33},{"degree":8,"count":45},{"degree":9,"count":53},{"degree":10,"count":63},{"degree":11,"count":79},{"degree":12,"count":105},{"degree":13,"count":196},{"degree":14,"count":147},{"degree":15,"count":22},{"degree":16,"count":8},{"degree":17,"count":9},{"degree":18,"count":1},{"degree":19,"count":1},{"degree":20,"count":1},{"degree":2251,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity6
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":237},{"arity":3,"count":2249},{"arity":6,"count":2250}]
Number of extensional constraints2250
Number of intensional constraints2486
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":2250},{"type":"intension","count":2486}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Choco-solver 4.0.7b par (e747e1e) (complete)4297936SAT (TO)589221986 2883.99 2520.1
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-08-14 (complete)4309292SAT (TO)605046646 19823.5 2520.38
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-07-02 (complete)4292055SAT (TO)605046649 19789 2520.66

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 589221986
Solution found:
--too large--