2018 XCSP3 competition: parallel solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Fapp/Fapp-m2s/
Fapp-m2s-08-0700_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameFapp/Fapp-m2s/
Fapp-m2s-08-0700_c18.xml
MD5SUM1726f38b1078149b3b3b5e51280bc638
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark1239102092
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3171.08
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables11265
Number of constraints7122
Number of domains159
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size141
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":4},{"size":2,"count":3984},{"size":11,"count":3288},{"size":12,"count":1},{"size":21,"count":10},{"size":23,"count":9},{"size":27,"count":51},{"size":31,"count":72},{"size":34,"count":11},{"size":35,"count":15},{"size":37,"count":59},{"size":38,"count":4},{"size":39,"count":29},{"size":40,"count":1},{"size":41,"count":17},{"size":42,"count":10},{"size":43,"count":1},{"size":44,"count":7},{"size":45,"count":25},{"size":47,"count":11},{"size":49,"count":70},{"size":51,"count":80},{"size":52,"count":2},{"size":53,"count":2},{"size":54,"count":5},"...",{"size":104,"count":55}, {"size":105,"count":9}, {"size":106,"count":46}, {"size":107,"count":8}, {"size":108,"count":6}, {"size":109,"count":6}, {"size":111,"count":41}, {"size":112,"count":53}, {"size":113,"count":10}, {"size":114,"count":14}, {"size":115,"count":6}, {"size":117,"count":78}, {"size":118,"count":117}, {"size":119,"count":35}, {"size":127,"count":73}, {"size":128,"count":21}, {"size":129,"count":2}, {"size":130,"count":15}, {"size":131,"count":18}, {"size":133,"count":2}, {"size":135,"count":74}, {"size":136,"count":50}, {"size":137,"count":18}, {"size":140,"count":8}, {"size":141,"count":1776}]
Minimum variable degree1
Maximum variable degree3289
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":1,"count":2},{"degree":2,"count":9869},{"degree":3,"count":14},{"degree":4,"count":31},{"degree":5,"count":51},{"degree":6,"count":71},{"degree":7,"count":99},{"degree":8,"count":104},{"degree":9,"count":116},{"degree":10,"count":158},{"degree":11,"count":226},{"degree":12,"count":258},{"degree":13,"count":171},{"degree":14,"count":35},{"degree":15,"count":26},{"degree":16,"count":18},{"degree":17,"count":8},{"degree":18,"count":6},{"degree":19,"count":1},{"degree":3289,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity6
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":546},{"arity":3,"count":3288},{"arity":6,"count":3288}]
Number of extensional constraints3288
Number of intensional constraints3834
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":3288},{"type":"intension","count":3834}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Choco-solver 4.0.7b par (e747e1e) (complete)4297928SAT (TO)1239102092 3171.08 2520.57
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-07-02 (complete)4292040SAT (TO)1252915917 19561.7 2520.46
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-08-14 (complete)4309284SAT (TO)1256764022 19610.4 2520.54

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 1239102092
Solution found:
--too large--